Tuesday, February 21, 2012

On February 17, LNEA leaders received an email from KNEA with details of the bill (House Bill 2634) being considered by the Education Committee for the Kansas House of Representatives.

My email to Representative Goodman was one of about 400 she received. Here it is, FYI.

Feb 20

Dear Representative Goodman,

I am completely dismayed by what I have read about HB 2634. Commissioner DeBacker and a lot of Kansas educators have been working together to develop the Kansas Educator Evaluation Protocol to meet the federal government's requirements, and they have gone about it in a methodical, logical manner. It is being field-tested already! It seems counterproductive, even chaotic, to impose another system on educators at this point in time.

I'm even more aghast at the proposed amendment that forces a teacher to prove he or she is effective if it should come to the point of a due process hearing. I concede that there are ineffective teachers who should find another work, but there are also ineffective administrators in at least the same proportions! It is very unfair--even counter to our American system of justice--to put the burden of proof on the teacher. Administrators should have to do their jobs and document those things that they say make a teacher ineffective! You wouldn't ask doctors to prove to a jury that they did everything right from start to finish; instead, in the U.S., we ask someone who accuses a doctor of malpractice to prove the doctor did something wrong!

Finally, I believe strongly that all students deserve to have teachers who not only know the curriculum they are teaching, but also how to teach it. For a doctor, knowledge of anatomy is not enough to do surgery! We need practioners who have learned the procedures and have done supervised practice. As I understand it, an amendment recently adopted would allow untrained, untested teachers to practice on our students.

Please vote NO on HB 2634.
Ginger Riddle