Tuesday, March 4, 2014

LNEA team met on snow day

     LNEA wants to thank teachers of USD 453 for the patience you've shown throughout the negotiation process.  We know it's sometimes difficult -- in many ways -- to continue putting forth maximum effort when we don't have a contract for 2013-14.  We regret that we were not able to warn you last spring or even in the fall that this would be a possibility.  We certainly didn't foresee that the co-op budget would be as problematic as it has turned out to be, and the dissolution had not been proposed when we started negotiations.
     We have worked very hard trying to generate creative solutions that satisfy the interests of our teachers, the board of education, and the co-op board, but up to now the district has not been willing to compromise.
     All year, the district has been telling LNEA it can't give movement to teachers because there isn't enough money in the special education co-op budget to give movement to special education teachers.  We finally decided we had to stop expecting all teachers to sacrifice because of this issue.  The proposal we made last Thursday may seem radical but please believe we tried everything else first. We believe it would be better for teachers in Leavenworth in the long run than simply accepting their one-time offer.  And please know that we didn't like having to make it, but we must work within and between the barricades that the district and special education cooperative have erected.
     Here is what we proposed in discussion with USD 453 administrators last Thursday.
  • Lateral movement now for all teachers who have earned additional degrees or credit hours and filed their paperwork with the district.
  • $500 now for all teachers paid from the special education budget.
  • Vertical movement now for teachers not paid from the special education budget.  For those whose movement gives them less than $500, we proposed they receive the difference (so no one would lose out by getting movement instead of a one-time $500 payment).
  • For special education teachers who continue with USD 453 into next year, we suggested salary schedule movement and back pay (minus the $500) as they enter into the 2014-15 school year.
     This may not seem fair to our out-of-district teachers who will not be with USD 453 next year, but in fact, most of them appear to be getting a fair offer from the school districts they are going to. In general, the neighboring districts are making sure the special ed teachers don't lose pay, and LNEA has learned that some teachers are even being offered $2000 to $5000 more each year than they currently make.
     The first question the district raised during our conversation was whether this is legal.  KNEA has assured us that it is.  Associations bargain for different things for different groups of teachers within their bargaining units all the time.  In Abilene, for example, there are two completely different salary schedules--one for teachers who started before 2005 and another for teachers who began later. 
     Our goal here is to do the best we can for our teachers, and the district insists that $500 per teacher is the best it can do for teachers paid by the special ed co-op at this time, because the Superintendents' Advisory Board (SAB) will not "authorize" more.  So, we proposed that special ed teachers get the $500 the SAB has authorized and that the rest of the cost of movement be postponed and offered only to the SpEd teachers who will continue with USD 453 once they are known. Those are the folks who won't benefit from the offers being made by other districts.  There will be no need for authorization from the SAB once the co-op dissolves.  There will be a need to do the right thing by our special education teachers, especially with higher salaries being paid by our neighboring districts.
     Did we want to make a proposal that separated teachers by whether they teach special education or not? Unequivocally, no. But the district created a division by its handling of this issue from the beginning.
        The district has agreed to meet with us again on Thursday, March 6, at 4:30, at the district office.  If we cannot reach an agreement, the factfinding session is scheduled for 9 a.m. on March 17. We would very much like to hear your comments, either here on the blog, or by email at lneanews@gmail.com.  Thanks for all you do for our students!

19 comments:

  1. My thanks to your team. I know there must be other things you'd rather be doing. Thansk for your efforts on our behalf!

    ReplyDelete
  2. "...the neighboring districts are making sure the special ed teachers don't lose pay...."
    However, that means the special education teachers did not receive a raise for the 2013-2014 school year nor the 2014-2015 school year. How many districts out of the 6 are offering more money to their "new" sped teachers?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are being told that Tonganoxie, Basehor and Fort Leavenworth are giving teachers all their years of service. For teachers who lost years of service when they joined USD 453 this can be a boon. New teachers and teachers whose experience is all with USD 453 may have been on a step commensurate with their years of teaching experience already.

      In at least one case, a district gave a teacher steps to make the salary competitive with USD 453's.

      Salary is not the only consideration. In all the other districts whose contracts we've reviewed, the health insurance contribution is higher. One district pays $425 per month toward health insurance. Compare that to USD 453's $305. The difference adds up.

      Delete
    2. Wow. The difference does add up. To more than the value of step movement. Guess it's only the teachers in USD 453 that are getting the shaft.

      Delete
  3. Thank you for all of your hard work!!! Your efforts are appreciated by all!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The offers from other districts for cooperative employees of $2,000 - $5,000 over what they are currently making are most likely rare. I'm not sure where this information comes from and it would be more appropriate for you to know this as fact prior to posting it. This type of information without verification only serves to make further divisions between the general education and special education staff. Individuals earning that much more than their current compensation most likely had column movement that placed them at a higher rate of pay when transferred to a different salary schedule. Also, it is not uncommon for teachers who leave USD 453 employment to earn significantly more when they accept a job in another district.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This information is accurate. We do not have data about how widespread it is. But, teachers going to at least half of the districts in the county are being paid for all their years of service. Many teachers lost five years or more of previous teaching experience when they came to the district. This explains why, as you say, it is not uncommon to make more money when they go to another district.

      Delete
  5. We do appreciate your hard work (all year!) on our behalf but as a SPED teacher, I'm disappointed that the press this year has laid this problem at our feet like we are the problem, further dividing reg ed & SPED teachers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LNEA knows, and we believe the teachers in USD 453 know, that the budget problems are NOT the fault of special education teachers!

      Delete
  6. In my 25 years as a LV SPED Teacher and NEA member I've never felt the division of reg ed vs special ed like I do with these negotiations. It shouldn't matter what I may or may not be making NEXT YEAR as an out of district teacher, what is important is what I'm not getting this year. I thought, as a paid member of NEA, NEA would negotiate for me even though I'm a SPED teacher. Apparently that is not the case. I cannot express how very disappointed I am in the entire process, and it's making me seriously reconsider my membership in NEA. Also, what happens if the dissolution of the LCSEC is not approved?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As we said in this post, "For special education teachers who continue with USD 453 into next year, we suggested salary schedule movement and back pay (minus the $500) as they enter into the 2014-15 school year." If the coop does not dissolve, those teachers would have fallen into this category.

      You can't squeeze blood from a turnip, and we've been convinced that the special ed cooperative budget is a turnip. There is no point in our rehashing the reasons it is a turnip, but nothing will happen for any teachers in USD 453 until either the turnip is divided among the 6 districts in the county, or, if forced to continue together by the state, those districts replant the garden.

      Delete
  7. I don't see a plan for special education teachers should the dissolution not take place. Sounds like then all the special education teachers will "get the shaft." Considering the information of the dissolution was not known prior to this year, I'm not convinced that saying that these teachers are going to make $2,000-$5,000 (which I would also like to see confirmed data on) more should go into account for a contract that should have already been signed and provided this year. Not only is there a division being created between regular education teachers and special education but also between special education teachers "within USD 453" and "outside USD453."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We said "For special education teachers who continue with USD 453 into next year, we suggested salary schedule movement and back pay (minus the $500) as they enter into the 2014-15 school year." If the coop does not dissolve, those teachers would fall into this category.

      Delete
  8. Your negotiations should NOT have been based on whether or not the COOP dissolves. Furthermore, the other districts have contributed their amount to USD 453 for the COOP budget...USD 453 is asking for additional money! The Special Education teachers who choose to remain in the districts where they are currently assigned are getting the shaft. Who in LNEA has been looking out for us?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The co-op situation has been looming over negotiations all year. The LNEA team does not get to decide whether it influences the outcome. It does. The team has explored option after option but every possibility that offers movement to teachers paid by the special education budget has been rebuffed. At this point the team needs to be working on a 2014-15 contract.

      Delete
  9. What a mess. Thank you for all the time you have spent on this. I wish the outcome could be different but will have to rely on your judgement.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am an out of district SPED provider who has received an offer that will end up being slightly less money than I currently make. I do not know where you are coming up with the 2000-5000 dollars difference. The base salary in the district I work in is higher than 453's base and for my years of experience in the coop (the district is planning to honor all of my years) it will almost make up the difference of the loss of a stipend I currently receive. My district is not planning at this time to continue the ~$3000 stipend that was used in part to attract and keep certain SPED providers in specialized positions. Others in my position will be losing over $1000 to close to $3000 if they choose to remain in the district I work in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We assume that the loss of a stipend for being an OT, SLP or school psych will also mean that your duty day is being shortened. The additional stipends negotiated for OT's, SLP's and school psychologists support a 30-minute extension of the duty day. A shorter workday may be a positive development that you want to consider. However, if the stipend is more important to you, then you do have the option of remaining with USD 453.

      Delete
  11. I hope you realize that as an employee of USD 453, you have every right to remain in USD 453.

    ReplyDelete